Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986)

People like to say that the best biopics focus on a small window of time in their subjects’ lives instead of scrambling to cover everything from birth to death. The traditional cradle-to-grave biopic format (as so perfectly parodied in Walk Hard: The Lend of Dewey Cox) has long gone out of favor, with the current preference being for slice-of-life portraits of famous people in their quieter, private moments. The 1986 true-crime biopic Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer was ahead of the curve on that trend, choosing to focus on a small snippet of real-life serial killer Henry Lee Lucas’s infamous crime spree instead of creating a full profile of his life from childhood to arrest. Only, the movie eventually proved to be a warning about choosing the wrong slice-of-life moment in your subject’s biography, since it happened to focus on a small window of time in Lucas’s life that he very likely made up and did not happen at all, thank God. Lucas became famous for confessing to hundreds of murders during police interrogation after arrest in Texas, with his former cellmate Ottis Toole bragging that he was an accomplice in the headline-grabbing crime spree. The problem is that Lucas was just telling the cops what they wanted to hear, allowing them to close as many unsolved murder cases as they wanted to pin on him as long as it made the jailtime for his actual crimes easier to bear. Of the 600 murders he confessed to, it’s difficult to fully decipher which ones he was actually guilty of, and so Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer has eventually transformed into a print-the-legend endeavor, operating more as a composite portrait of a serial killer rather than a detailed portrait of this serial killer.

A young Michael Rooker stars as the cold, unfeeling Henry, portraying his brief time in Chicago as the roommate of former prison buddy Ottis Toole (Tom Towles). Ottis invites his semi-estranged sister Becky (Tracy Arnold) to crash on the couch for a while, and the trio momentarily form a fucked-up family unit that repeats the abuses they each suffered as children. Ottis & Becky both reveal to Henry that they were raised by a physically abusive father, and Henry subconsciously takes over that role in their new family home — keeping them both in line with weaponized sexual tension and threats of physical violence. Things get even more unseemly as he takes Ottis under his wing as a night-owl serial killer, strangling, stabbing, and shooting the citizens of Chicago at random as a form of stress relief. It’s unclear what Henry’s own abusive backstory might be, as nailing down the details of how and why he killed his own mother is just as difficult for these fictionalized characters as nailing down the details of his actual crime spree was for real-life journalists. Rooker mostly portrays him as a blank slate with nothing going on behind his empty, black eyes besides an unexplained compulsion to kill. He’s equally soft-spoken and vicious, without much internal life to be accessed past his hardened surface. Likewise, his crimes are depicted from an alienating distance, focused more on the stillness of his victims’ bodies in the aftermath than on the passionate thrill of his murders in real time. As a result, Henry’s only truly knowable in how he interacts with his abuse-victim roommates, making this more of a family portrait than the portrait of a single man.

Speaking of family portraits, the movie Henry most reminded me of was the 2003 horror anthology Family Portraits: A Trilogy of America, which also found infinite cruelty behind the closed doors of American family homes. That insidious tone is also echoed in James Benning’s experimental true-crime documentary Landscape Suicide, where the setting and the aftermath of vicious crimes are similarly preserved in cold tableaux. It’s a discomforting approach to crime-story filmmaking, no matter how true the crimes being depicted are to real life, which likely helps explain why Henry was stuck in distribution limbo for four years after its festival premiere despite the wide accessibility of the era’s more fantastical body-count slashers. Most of the real-time violence depicted onscreen is mediated through the remove of VHS camcorder recordings that Henry & Ottis film to review later at home over beers, once again chilling the audience at an unfeeling distance instead of submerging us in the heat of the moment. No matter what distribution issues it may have initially suffered for its unforgiving iciness, the movie’s long-term legacy has endured to hold cult-horror audiences’ fasciation as a kind of sleepover-dare endurance test. I happened to catch it in a new, cleaned-up 4k restoration at this year’s ScreamFest NOLA, where I got to experience the browns & greys of its abject squalor in fine HD detail. It no longer matters, really, whether any of the crimes Henry depicts actually happened, since the movie itself has been traumatizing enough on its own merits for thrill-seeking audiences looking to be chilled to the bone.

-Brandon Ledet

Podcast #276: Papi Gudia (1996) & Asian Regional Horror

Welcome to Episode #276 of The Swampflix Podcast. For this episode, Brandon, James, Britnee, and Hanna discuss a grab bag of horror titles from India & Indonesia, starting with the unsanctioned Child’s Play remake Papi Gudia (1996).

00:00 Welcome
02:13 Soulm8te (2026)
05:40 Savage House (2026)
09:08 Killer Condom (1996)
17:00 The Appointment (1982)
22:30 The Devils (1971)
25:15 Dracula (1958)
26:55 Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986)

31:55 Papi Gudia (1996)
1:04:04 The Ornate Lock (Manichitrathazhu, 1993)

1:17:40 The Queen of Black Magic (1981)
1:28:35 Santet (1988)

You can stay up to date with our podcast through SoundCloud, Spotify, iTunes, TuneIn, or by following the links on this page.

– The Podcast Crew

Lagniappe Podcast: The Outing (1987)

For this lagniappe episode of The Swampflix Podcast, Boomer & Brandon discuss the Texan evil-genie horror novelty The Outing (aka The Lamp, 1987).

00:00 Nicole Kidman Magic at Barrett’s Too
07:00 Joybubbles (2026)
15:12 Hitchcock rankings
52:16 Cujo (1983)
57:50 Verity (2026)
1:03:57 Wicker (2026)
1:10:18 Wild Horse Nine (2026)

1:14:55 The Outing (1987)

You can stay up to date with our podcast through SoundCloud, Spotify, iTunes, TuneIn, or by following the links on this page.

– The Lagniappe Podcast Crew

Wicker (2026)

Let’s take a moment to appreciate how wonderfully bizarre it is that Yorgos Lanthimos is now an award-winning, crowd-pleasing auteur célèbre, when just a few years ago he was considered one of cinema’s cruelest basement-dwelling freaks. No one was watching Lanthimos’s sociopathic incest thriller Dogtooth and thinking, yes, this man will soon be nominated for major-category Oscars on an annual basis. Recent titles like The Favourite, Poor Things, and Bugonia have earned the Greek filmmaker enough of a cultural foothold that his influence is starting to show in other directors’ work, though, whereas earlier efforts like Dogtooth, The Lobster, and The Killing of a Sacred Deer were so singular in their distanced, self-delighted cruelty that they were peerless to the point of feeling otherworldly. Signaling this new paradigm, the fairy-tale romcom Wicker is loudly & proudly Lanthimosian in its tone: playing flat, affectless human cruelty for farcical humor in a way that’s unmistakably indebted to the director’s signature style. It’s also a much cozier, gentler picture than anything Lanthimos has ever directed himself, repurposing his alien viewpoint on everyday social rituals for something that can be sincerely, sweetly romantic.

In genre terms, Wicker is a monsterfucker romcom. Olivia Colman stars as a medieval fisherwoman who’s shunned from everyday social rituals by the younger, prettier women in her village who don’t reek of fish. Annoyed by her designated role as the town spinster & punchline, she commissions a magically gifted basket weaver (Peter Dinklage) to weave her a husband of her own whom she can parade about town to spite her many nemeses. The basket salesman over-delivers on the deal, crafting her the most handsome, devoted, virile husband the village has ever seen, as voiced & embodied by Alexander Skarsgård under a layer of interwoven prosthetics. The unlikely interspecies newlyweds canoodle, fuck, and promenade in such a cartoonishly loving fashion that it drives their fellow villagers mad with jealousy, none more so than the queen-bitch tailor’s wife (Elizabeth Debicki). The ads for Wicker sell it as a ribald sex comedy, but it’s ultimately much sweeter and more restrained than all that, functioning more as a  tongue-in-cheek fairy tale than as sincere erotica. Plenty of fan fiction is already being written on the subject, though, I’m sure, as Skarsgård’s basket man makes for the perfect himbo arm candy no matter what material he’s made of.

To Wicker‘s credit, it doesn’t borrow Lanthimos’s dry humor just for the sake of it; it serves a clear thematic purpose. Lanthimos’s movies always have a way of examining everyday social rituals from a distanced perspective that makes them look absurdly arbitrary, whether they be the rituals of familial life in Dogtooth or the rituals of romantic courtship in The Lobster or the rituals of office-work hierarchy in Kinds of Kindness or so on. For its part, Wicker takes a distanced, outsider look at the rituals of a traditional marriage and finds them as inhumanly arbitrary & absurd as any uncanny behavior in a proper Lanthimos film. It portrays marriage as a never-ending series of self-imposed social rituals, with the small European village where it’s set having developed its own variations on marital traditions that stray only a few steps away from the ongoing absurdity of modern social behavior. Instead of a bride being marked as her husband’s property with a shiny wedding ring, she is ceremonially collared with a giant ornate shackle that clamps around her throat. Instead of tossing a bouquet to expectant maidens, she distributes wicker eggs that explode into puffs of colored powder, à la gender-reveal announcement parties. Instead of the husband enjoying one final night of sexual freedom before marriage at the local strip bar, he is costumed with a strap-on carrot that’s ceremonially eaten by a goat, signifying his loss of manhood. It’s all very silly, and none of it is entirely foreign to the way we actually celebrate modern weddings.

Things get a little more serious inside the wicker man & stinky fisherwoman household, where the more private, routine rituals of married life are portrayed as natural & worthwhile. Colman & Skarsgård’s physically mismatched lovers are sincerely, demonstrably affectionate towards each other, which is a difficult sentiment to come by in a proper Lanthimos film. Most of the dramatic crises that arise are a result of outsiders’ petty jealousy for their mutual affection, while everyone else’s marriages appear to be primarily practical unions in commerce & sexual reproduction. This is a town where everyone’s personhood is defined by their occupation, after all, known only by names like Fisherwoman, Butcher, Butcher’s Wife, Tailor, Tailor’s Wife, and so on. Even Skarsgård’s wicker husband is eventually known by the name Fisherfucker, since sexually pleasing his wife appears to be his most productive daily endeavor. If the movie has any recognizable value of its own outside its extension of Lanthimosian anthropology to a new social ritual, it’s all in the convincingly magical quality of that wicker Fisherfucker’s screen presence, which is just as mesmerizing to the viewer as it is to his fellow villagers. He’s an incredible creature-feature specimen, mixing practical prosthetic applications with post-production touchups that allow specks of sunlight to shine through his sexy wicker body. He is also, quite literally, perfect husband material, and the core of the movie’s heart & humor rests in the way pointless societal pressures fuck that perfect scenario up for his loving wife.

-Brandon Ledet

Joybubbles (2026)

I am writing this review in a modestly sized, concerningly musty hotel room in Hot Springs, Arkansas, which still feels like the height of modern luxury in the way that all hotel rooms do. We are staying at the century-old resort hotel The Arlington, which overlooks the main stretch of the city’s historic bathhouse spas, towering above the punier tourist traps below as a monument to the timeless joys of a hotel getaway. Unbeknownst to me when booking this vacation, The Arlington is also the central screening hub for the longest-running documentary film festival in the United States, which happened to overlap with our stay. The one film in this year’s program that I was able to squeeze into my busy schedule of resting & relaxing around town also happened to be about the one person who could credibly claim to love mediocre hotel rooms more than anyone else who ever lived: Joe Engressia, whose unmatched obsession with the Holiday Inn hotel chain somehow doesn’t rank among his top ten most eccentric character quirks. Engressia was a man of many quirks, just as he was a man of many names: High-Rise Joe, The Whistler, and—most notably—Joybubbles, the last of which provided the eponymous name of his documentary profile that just screened at the 35th annual Hot Springs Documentary Film Festival (after premiering at Sundance earlier this year).

Joybubbles first earned fame as The Whistler in his college years, when his uncannily perfect whistling pitch enabled him to bypass telephone system infrastructure to make expensive long-distance phone calls free of charge. He was a naturally gifted pioneer of the practice, which made him a legend among other Phone Phreakers of the 1960s & 70s, who later went on to become the earliest computer hacker subculture of note. His own whistling hack was an innovation inspired more by loneliness than by mischief, though. Joybubbles was born blind and spent long childhood hours isolated indoors, with only the telephone connecting him to the outside world. By listening to the equipment’s clicks & whirs and pestering the phone operators on the other end of the dial tone, he gradually figured out how to extend the reach of his phone line even further, which is how he earned the Batmanesque moniker The Whistler.  Even when arrested for these violations of phone-company policy, Joybubbles always used his national notoriety as a means of expanding his social network so he’d have more people to talk to on the phone. He played the media’s bottomless hunger for “human interest” stories by becoming a human of great, continual interest — not to hack the planet but to just feel less alone.

Before he legally changed his name to Joybubbles, this first-wave phone phreaker was also known as High-Rise Joe, named after his lifelong goal of living independently in his own high-rise apartment. Being visually disabled a half-century ago made that goal a lot more daunting than it sounds now, as most people in Joe’s life attempted to limit his independence & mobility for their convenience, in the guise of ensuring his safety. He learned independence in his early 20s by booking extended stays at Holiday Inns, however, which he had to treat with the same problem-solving bravery of mankind traveling to the moon as he worked his way up to full-time high-rise living. As a result, Joybubbles ends up playing as a celebration of mundane hotel getaways just as much as it is a celebration of humanity’s intimate relationships with mundane technology. Joybubbles loved Holiday Inns and high-rise apartments with the same childlike wonder which he loved rotary-dial telephones. As interviewees put it, he made a lifelong mission out of maintaining that childlike wonder with the mundane in a commitment to “staying 5-years-old forever.” His resulting personality fell somewhere between Daniel Johnston & Mister Rogers — half age-regression as art-project coping mechanism and half age-regression as defiance against an increasingly crass & cruel modern world.

As a documentary, Joybubbles mostly functions as a feature-length human interest story akin to the news clippings that profiled its subject while he was alive. These news reports & televised interviews from Joe’s phone phreaker days are helpful in providing some visual archival material of interest, while the rest of the runtime is padded out with vintage industrial footage, modern animation, and still photographs. With a few changes to how its interviewees are introduced via chyron, the whole project could be easily reworked into a podcast instead of a feature film, which would be just as well for a documentary about a blind man. In an especially telling segment, one of Joybubbles’s friends relates his age-regressed personality to Tom Hanks’s character in Big, as he recalls describing the imagery of the film to Joybubbles in real time at the movies, since he otherwise only had the sounds of the dialogue to go by. Oddly enough, this segment includes footage of the “Zoltar” fortune teller machine that grants Hanks’s wish to become “big” in the first place, and there are multiple replicas of that machine decorating the tourist-packed sidewalks of downtown Hot Springs, just outside of the festival. Stepping outside of my own city to breathe some crisp mountain air, enjoy a couple late-night beers in my overly air-conditioned hotel bed, and meet some sweetheart strangers along the way has been a truly restorative experience for my soul. And I owe the Hot Springs Documentary Film Festival for introducing me to the biggest, quirkiest sweetheart of them all.

-Brandon Ledet 

Podcast #275: The Perfume of the Lady in Black (1974) & Giallo Deep Cuts

Welcome to Episode #275 of The Swampflix Podcast. For this episode, Brandon, James, Britnee, and Hanna discuss a grab bag of lesser-seen giallo flicks, starting with 1974’s The Perfume of the Lady in Black (1974).

00:00 Welcome
01:15 Onslaught (2026)
02:22 Resident Evil (2026)
07:53 The Blood on Satan’s Claw (1971)
10:30 The Last Boy Scout (1991)
13:47 sMOTHERed (2026)
16:00 Miracle Mile (1988)
19:42 Shadows in Paradise (1986)

24:30 The Perfume of the Lady in Black (1974)
45:48 The Strange Vice of Mrs. Wardh (1971)
55:15 What Have You Done to Solange? (1972)
1:13:34 Footprints on the Moon (1975)

You can stay up to date with our podcast through SoundCloud, Spotify, iTunes, TuneIn, or by following the links on this page.

– The Podcast Crew

Burst City (1982)

What’s the most punk movie ever made? I have no idea how to quantify that, but 1982’s Burst City might be the movie with the most punks in it, which is close enough to earn the superlative. The final half-hour of Gakuryū Ishii’s microbudget sci-fi whatsit is absolutely flooded with punks — some playing themselves, some playing businessmen, some playing futuristic super-cops. The lead-up to that concluding spectacle has no discernible narrative structure to it, but the climax plays like a large-scale battlefield sequence from a studio-produced war epic with hundreds of costumed extras. Only, in this case, everyone onscreen is from the same underground 80s Japanese punk scene, including the underpaid and overworked weirdos operating the super-8mm cameras in that subculture warzone. The never-ending sequence feels genuinely dangerous, to the point where it’s a miracle there are no reports that any extras died on set. It’s just an endless stream of Japanese punk rockers belligerently screaming and throwing their bodies at each other while explosions go off in the background and the band plays on & on like a buzzsaw with a taped-down trigger.

There aren’t multiple plot threads in Burst City so much as there are multiple character factions. The bulk of the cast is made up of leather-jacketed punks who play constant D.I.Y. shows at a warehouse venue called Live Spot 20000V (a name echoed by Ishii’s later title Electric Dragon 80000V). They actively resist taking on real work with local real estate developers or yakuza gangsters, declaring, “We’re too artistic to work for the likes of you!” Those corrupt, suited men do occasionally employ a few of the punk scenesters in BDSM sex work, though, even while forming “anti-punk resistance groups” that aim to eradicate them entirely. Meanwhile, roving gangs of post-apocalyptic Mad Max warriors seek refuge throughout a labyrinthian industrial wasteland, with the most clearly characterized duo among them seeking revenge for a slain brother. Politically, there’s a wide range of big-picture turmoil that Burst City‘s infinite cast of punk wastoids are rebelling against, most specifically in the threat that their home-turf music venue will soon be replaced by a nuclear power plant for capitalistic profits. For the most part, however, they seemingly just want to rock out, and they’re willing to crack a few hundred skulls as long as it keeps the amps plugged in.

In cyberpunk terms, Burst City offers half the cyber and twice the punk. It’s the kind of low budget, high style sci-fi that feels less imaginative of a possible future than it is documentary of its own contemporary arts scene. There is no plot development or dialogue exchange that’s given a fraction of the attention afforded its live performances from contemporary bands with names like The Rockers and The Battle Rockers. Before the production breaks down into full punks-vs-cops warfare, its clearest narrative progression is in a scene where a hardcore band rushes the stage, steals the equipment, and takes over the set from a first-wave punk act, demonstrating the early-80s aesthetic shift of punk rock music in real time. A lot of loving attention to detail is also paid to the crowd watching these bands from the pit, with the 8mm cameras on constant fashion watch as extras primp, smoke, and pose for their unseen audience. Ishii had originally planned to tell a much more traditional story in Burst City before the money ran out and he had to pivot from the original script to a much looser collection of narrative scraps, stitched together in hyperactive music-video collage. The result is not style over substance so much that its style is its substance, especially as a documentary glimpse of a regional punk scene being recorded the way it wanted to be seen — cool as fuck, stylish as hell.

Burst City‘s climactic punk warfare sequence is legendarily abrasive. As if the constant roar of electric guitars, motorcycle engines, and screaming leather freaks wasn’t already loud enough, the crowd starts setting off fireworks to invite in some extra noise, and the cops, in turn, start blowing the place up. It’s all belligerent, incoherent youth-culture rage, with more intent communicated by characters’ pained writing & screaming in the dirt than any written line of dialogue. Ishii & crew can hardly keep up with the chaos themselves, switching formats from color to black & white film stock to CCTV video feeds at a dizzying pace. At two full hours, its youth-culture belligerence is admittedly exhausting, but its concluding spectacle is still undeniably impressive on a technical level and undeniably punk.

-Brandon Ledet

Lagniappe Podcast: Godzilla vs. Biollante (1989)

For this lagniappe episode of The Swampflix Podcast, Boomer & Brandon discuss the genre-mashing creature feature Godzilla vs. Biollante (1989).

00:00 Welcome
01:28 Nicole Kidman Magic at Barrett’s Too
03:10 Shaun the Sheep: The Beast of Mossy Bottom (2026)
10:00 The Trouble with Harry (1955)
14:35 The Lodger (1927)
20:25 Chronovisor (2026)
26:27 The History of Concrete (2026)
34:33 Primetime (2026)
47:33 Burst City (1982)
54:45 Hope (2026)
1:01:45 Resident Evil (2026)
1:11:43 They Will Kill You (2026)
1:14:23 Digger (2026)

1:20:43 Godzilla vs. Biollante (1989)

You can stay up to date with our podcast through SoundCloud, Spotify, iTunes, TuneIn, or by following the links on this page.

– The Lagniappe Podcast Crew

The History of Concrete (2026)

Hey, New Orleans. The new John Wilson documentary The History of Concrete is currently playing at Canal Place, which is likely only exciting to you if you’re already a fan of John Wilson. Convincing the uninitiated to join you on a Friday night for a documentary about concrete would take a heroically persuasive sales pitch, but fans of the show How To with John Wilson already know to expect that this doc will hardly be about concrete at all. Yes, Wilson’s comedic HBO docuseries is surprisingly fixated on urban infrastructure, but each episode gradually proves to be more about the infinite variety of people who populate New York City than the building materials of the city itself. As Wilson’s first feature-length effort in this project, The History of Concrete is very much just an extended episode of How To. It starts off as a willfully naive, wandering exploration of the history & production of concrete, but it’s constantly on the hunt for one-of-a-kind interview subjects to profile along the way. Wilson edits & narrates his voyeuristic man-on-the-street journalism with the same wry, soft-spoken humor that he deploys on his television show, including all of your favorite well-timed vocal tics & throat clearings to liven up concrete’s otherwise absurdly dry history. You don’t have to already be a fan of the show to find the movie funny or poignant; every episode of How To is self-contained enough to work perfectly well on its own, this extended one included. You’re just unlikely to spend your precious free time after work going to see a documentary about concrete unless you already trust Wilson’s Muppet-like voice.

If you are already a fan of How To with John Wilson, you might be worried about how the show’s format could sustain a 100-min runtime, nearly five-times longer than the usual episode length. Thankfully, The History of Concrete does a lot of that worrying for you; it’s just as much about the outlandishness of its own production as it is about urban construction materials. Wilson confesses early in the runtime that a major reason he stopped making How To episodes back in 2023 is that the show depleted his personal archive of digicam footage from public life in NYC. At a loss on how to start fresh without forcing his slice-of-urban-life observations into being instead of finding them naturally, he seeks out more traditional methods of feature-length commercial moviemaking. He learns narrative structure by attending a screenwriting workshop on how to successfully write & pitch a Hallmark Christmas movie, a course that is offered as a life raft for filmmakers who are struggling with the lack of sellable work in the industry’s current production dip. On the documentary-specific end, he discusses in voiceover how the only sellable subgenre in the current market is the “rockumentary”: fluff piece profiles of famous musicians that populate the splash page on every streaming service. His application of these industry lessons to his own work are, as you’d expect, ironic. When Wilson seeks out musician subjects to arbitrarily profile in his concrete doc, he’s exclusively drawn to no-name noise artists that he runs across in the D.I.Y. punk venues he frequents socially. He does eventually stumble onto a How To-worthy interview subject who works a double life as a liquor sales rep and the lead-musician in a dive-bar cover band, but that lonely, lost man’s screen persona does not exactly scream star appeal. He does offer Wilson an emotional core for the film’s narrative that can be edited into the vague shape of a Hallmark Christmas movie, but Wilson’s constant Zoom meetings with potential financiers don’t successfully convey the commercial potential of the project.

While Wilson continuously struggles to sell The History of Concrete to potential buyers in the industry, he immediately makes the clearest pitch to his audience yet about what makes his filmmaking style so compelling in the first place: documentation of mundane modern living while most other media is obsessed with recreating the past. Part of documenting the absurdity of everyday public life in New York City means that Wilson regularly runs across other, more robustly funded film crews. He’s at odds with the professional film & television projects that cross over onto his turf, not just financially but also philosophically. So many movies that film in the neighborhoods he frequents make an art project out of dressing the city up to look like its past historical self, instead of setting stories in those spaces as they look now. That’s what’s so quietly radical about the How To television show; it accurately captures the daily experience of modern city life, of meeting an infinite number of kind souls and unimaginable weirdos on public sidewalks and public transit from one task to the next. I even see my own specific city life reflected on the screen in the rare episodes where he attends construction-material conventions in New Orleans, including one for concrete. It’s oddly validating to see that mundane modernity treated with such wide-eyed reverence from John Wilson the character and with such barely-contained amusement from John Wilson the filmmaker. That’s especially true in The History of Concrete‘s case, since it offered the rare opportunity to laugh & react to urban life’s absurdism with a full theatrical audience instead of alone in my living room. It reminded me of going to see Downton Abbey movies in theaters in that way; Molesley’s colossal fuckups serving dinner to royalty weren’t any funnier in the movies than they were on the television, but they got much bigger gasps & laughs from a crowd that was happy to celebrate their favorite show together with likeminded nerds.

The History of Concrete never closes the loop on how it secured its own funding. I suppose that’s a detail best left to its Wikipedia page. It does manage to incorporate preposterous, meaningless footage of big-name celebrities (names as incongruous as Kim Kardashian, DMX, Jacob Elordi, and Michael Imperioli), so maybe that helped. None of those stars have half the impact of Wilson’s more typical interview subjects, though, like the lonely liquor-ambassador musician or the guy whose Gum Busters business scrapes gum off concrete or the guy whose Dead Ink tattoo preservation business might hold the secret to where the real-life Chef Boyardee is buried. Then, there’s the actual concrete of the title, which overwhelms the film’s visual language with the cracked & patched grey infinity of urban landscapes. Sometimes, the documentary can be sincerely informative about concrete, especially when slipping behind the scenes of municipal infrastructure to interview city workers about the scarily short lifespan of the concrete buildings, bridges, and overpasses we use everyday. More often, it seeks out the absurd instances where we’ve intentionally become disconnected from the direct impact of concrete, like at speed-bricklaying competitions or at virtual-reality concrete pours inside convention center tech showcases. Mostly, it’s all just an excuse to walk around and observe the people who populate the concrete around us both as intimate interview subjects and as distanced bugs-in-a-jar specimens of modern urbanity. I don’t know how you sell that idea to an audience who’s not immediately interested, but apparently neither does John Wilson, and it’s a miracle he’s gotten this kind of work distributed to our televisions & movie theaters in the first place.

-Brandon Ledet

Podcast #274: Jamaica Inn (1939) & Hitchcock Blind Spots

Welcome to Episode #274 of The Swampflix Podcast. For this episode, Brandon & Boomer catch up on some personal Alfred Hitchcock blind spots, starting with his final British production, Jamaica Inn (1939).

00:00 Halloween Streaming Report
02:00 Dead Calm (1989) at Barrett’s Too
05:37 Hitchcock rankings
08:06 Jamaica Inn (1939)
30:20 Rebecca (1940)
51:11 The Wrong Man (1956)
1:15:34 North by Northwest (1959)
1:43:18 Hitch quiz

You can stay up to date with our podcast through SoundCloud, Spotify, iTunes, TuneIn, or by following the links on this page.

– The Podcast Crew